Tomorrow Congress
is quietly attempting to sneak through a bill that would allow federal
grant money to go directly to the brick and mortar rebuilding of
churches and other houses of worship.
Despite its unconstitutionality, lawmakers tomorrow will consider HR 592—a
bill to amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency
Assistance Act, to allow houses of worship to directly receive taxpayer
dollars.
There’s a reason houses of worship are prohibited. This
bill would reverse years of Supreme Court precedent and directly
conflict with the First Amendment to the Constitution. Additionally,
permitting public grants for churches and other houses of worship would
unfairly privilege religious institutions above secular institutions,
many of which are not eligible for the grants.
This
bill comes two weeks after churches were granted special exemptions
from a law requiring coverage of contraceptive services. Churches are
attempting to have their cake and eat it too. They want to choose when
they must comply with a law and when laws must comply with them.
Passage of the bill
would create unfair advantages for religious institutions—and in effect,
a government endorsement of religion-- because these institutions are
exempt from paying taxes, offering financial transparency and filing the
same paperwork as secular organizations, but would still benefit from
public tax dollars.
Tell Congress, not so fast! Will you send a letter to your Representative urging him or her to vote no on this bill right now?
No comments:
Post a Comment